Specific Performance in Breach of Contract: A Case Study

Introduction

Breach of contract cases typically result in monetary damages as the primary remedy. However, under exceptional circumstances, courts may grant equitable remedies like specific performance. Specific performance compels the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations. The case of Travellers International, AG v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. offers a compelling illustration of the circumstances under which specific performance might be granted.

Background of the Case

Travellers International specialized in organizing and conducting vacation tours across multiple countries. In the early 1970s, Travellers entered into a contractual agreement with Trans World Airlines (TWA) to provide ground tours for TWA’s European vacation packages. This partnership involved Travellers meticulously planning annual tours, crafting marketing materials, and executing the tours themselves. TWA, in turn, handled the marketing and sale of these tours, along with providing the necessary flights.

The year 1984 saw Travellers and TWA solidify their collaboration with a contract set to run from 1986 to 1991. Under this agreement, TWA would receive the entirety of the airfare revenue and 6% of the tour fees. Travellers was entitled to 80% of the tour fees, while the remaining portion went to the booking agent. However, global events in the 1980s cast a shadow on the international tourism industry, leading to a decline in demand. Compounding this, both Travellers and TWA underwent ownership changes, straining their long-standing relationship.

Breach and Dispute

TWA’s new management, aiming to bolster profits, decided to bring tour development and operations in-house. Consequently, in September 1987, TWA terminated its contract with Travellers, citing alleged breaches of contract provisions—allegations that lacked substantiation.

This termination had dire consequences for Travellers. With over 90% of their business reliant on the contract with TWA, finding replacement business in time to remain operational was an insurmountable challenge. Travellers, left with little choice, filed a lawsuit. Their primary objective: securing a permanent injunction compelling TWA to specifically perform its contractual obligations.

Arguments and Evidence

Central to Travellers’ argument was the assertion that the contract constituted a relatively minor portion of TWA’s overall business, and fulfilling the contract would remain profitable for the airline. They presented evidence to support this claim, highlighting the disproportionate impact of the breach on their own operations.

The case landed in federal district court following TWA’s successful motion for removal. It was in this court that Travellers’ request for a permanent injunction, the mechanism for enforcing specific performance, was considered.

The Concept of Specific Performance

Specific performance represents an exceptional remedy in contract law. Courts are generally reluctant to grant it, opting instead for monetary damages. This reluctance stems from several factors:

Judicial Supervision: Enforcing specific performance often necessitates ongoing court supervision to ensure compliance, a task courts prefer to avoid.
Economic Efficiency: Awarding monetary damages is often viewed as a more economically efficient solution, allowing parties to pursue alternative arrangements.
Practicality: In some instances, compelling specific performance might be practically impossible or excessively burdensome.

When Specific Performance May Be Granted

Despite these reservations, specific performance may be deemed appropriate under specific circumstances, particularly when:

Uniqueness of Subject Matter: If the subject of the contract is unique or irreplaceable, monetary damages may not adequately compensate the non-breaching party. For instance, contracts involving real estate or one-of-a-kind items often fall into this category.
Inadequacy of Monetary Damages: When determining monetary damages proves exceedingly difficult or if such damages fail to truly compensate the injured party, specific performance might be considered.
Balance of Hardships: Courts weigh the hardships that granting or denying specific performance would impose on each party. If enforcing the contract significantly disadvantages the breaching party while the other party faces irreparable harm without it, specific performance might be favored.

External Resources

Conclusion

The Travellers International, AG v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. case underscores the complexities surrounding specific performance as a remedy for breach of contract. While it serves as a potential solution in situations where monetary damages prove insufficient, courts exercise careful consideration, weighing factors such as the uniqueness of the subject matter, the feasibility of calculating monetary damages, and the potential hardships imposed on both parties involved. This case serves as a reminder that seeking legal counsel is essential when navigating such intricate legal matters.